How to Track Time by Phase
Without Creating Admin Work
Time tracking only helps when it reflects how the project is actually managed. For architecture and engineering firms, that usually means tracking time by phase—not by vague project totals or overly detailed task lists.
Project Time Tracking Breaks Down When Everything Gets Dumped Into One Bucket
A lot of architecture and engineering firms technically track time.
People enter hours. Projects collect labor. Reports show totals.
But when all that time lands against one general project code, the data does not tell you much.
You may know the project has 280 hours in it. But where did those hours go?
Was schematic design heavier than expected?
Did construction administration eat the margin?
Did revisions quietly consume the fee?
Did one phase stay profitable while another phase went sideways?
When time is not tied to project phases, the firm loses one of the most important management signals it has: where the work is actually happening.
That is the real purpose of phase-based time tracking.
Not more administration.
Not more data entry.
Not more boxes for employees to fill out.
The purpose is to connect labor to the structure of the project so managers can see where budget, scope, and effort are drifting before the project is already damaged.
For A/E firms, the phase is usually the right level of detail.
Projects are too broad.
Individual tasks are often too granular.
Phases sit in the middle. They match how proposals are written, how fees are estimated, how work is managed, and how invoices are usually prepared.
That makes phase-based time tracking one of the simplest ways to turn timesheets from a payroll chore into useful project intelligence.
Time Tracking Should Match the Contract
If your proposal is organized by phase, your time tracking should be organized by phase too. Otherwise, you are comparing labor against a structure that does not exist in your billing or budget.
The Right Level of Detail Is Phase, Not Every Tiny Task
The mistake many firms make is assuming better time tracking means more detailed time tracking.
That is usually wrong.
If your team has to choose from dozens of tiny task codes every time they enter time, the system becomes a burden. People guess. They pick the first reasonable option. They stop caring about accuracy because the structure feels disconnected from how they actually work.
That creates admin work without creating better information.
The better approach is to track time at the level where project managers actually make decisions.
For most A/E firms, that means phases such as:
Schematic Design
Design Development
Construction Documents
Permitting
Bidding
Construction Administration
Additional Services
Reimbursable or expense-related work
Your firm may use different names. That is fine. The point is not to force every firm into the same phase list. The point is to create a structure that reflects how your projects are proposed, budgeted, billed, and reviewed.
A good phase structure should answer four questions:
Where did the time go?
Was that time part of the original contract?
Is the phase still within budget?
Is the work billable, non-billable, or outside the original scope?
That is enough.
You do not need employees choosing between twenty different flavors of “coordination” unless your billing or management process truly requires it.
The phase should do the heavy lifting.
Activity codes can help in some firms, but they should support the phase structure—not replace it. If your team cannot quickly identify the correct phase, the system is already too complicated.
The goal is simple entry and useful reporting.
That balance matters.
Too little structure gives you useless data.
Too much structure gives you bad data.
Phase-based time tracking is the middle ground.
More Detail Does Not Always Mean Better Data
If employees cannot easily choose the right code, your reports will look precise but be unreliable. A simpler phase structure usually produces cleaner information.
Phase-Based Time Tracking Shows Where Projects Start Losing Money
Project profitability rarely disappears all at once.
It leaks out through phases.
A fixed fee phase runs long.
An hourly not-to-exceed phase gets close to its cap.
A consultant-heavy phase requires more coordination than expected.
Construction administration turns into a steady stream of unpaid questions, site visits, and revisions.
Without phase-based time tracking, these problems stay hidden inside the total project budget. By the time someone notices, the project may already be over budget.
When time is tracked by phase, managers can see the pattern earlier.
They can compare actual labor against the phase budget.
They can see which phases are burning too quickly.
They can separate original scope from extra work.
They can spot repeat problems across similar projects.
That last point matters.
Phase-based tracking does not only help one project. It improves future pricing.
If your firm consistently loses money during construction administration, that is not just a project management issue. It is a pricing issue.
If permitting always takes more effort than expected, the next proposal should reflect that.
If additional services are being absorbed into original phases instead of tracked separately, your firm may be giving away work without realizing it.
Time by phase gives you the evidence.
It turns vague frustration into something specific:
“This phase was underpriced.”
“This work should have been additional service.”
“This client type requires more coordination.”
“This project manager’s budgets are realistic.”
“This service line needs a different fee structure.”
That is why phase-based time tracking matters. It connects daily time entry to project control, billing accuracy, and better future proposals.
Phase Data Improves Future Fees
The best fee history is not just total hours by project. It is hours by phase, tied to the kind of work actually performed.
How to Set Up Phase Tracking Without Making It Painful
How to Set Up Phase Tracking Without Making It Painful
The best phase-based time-tracking systems are boring.
That is a compliment.
They are clear, predictable, and easy for employees to use.
Start with how your firm already proposes work. If your proposals are organized into phases, use those phases as the starting point for time tracking.
Then keep the structure consistent across similar projects.
That does not mean every project needs the exact same phases. A small study and a large multi-phase engineering project may not need the same setup. But similar project types should use similar phase templates whenever possible.
That consistency makes reporting useful.
It also makes time entry easier because employees do not have to learn a new structure for every project.
Next, separate the original scope from extra work.
This is where many firms get into trouble. Additional services are buried within existing phases, making the original phase appear unprofitable and obscuring the fact that the firm performed work it should have billed separately.
If extra work is real, it should be visible.
That does not mean every small conversation needs its own phase. But meaningful out-of-scope work should not be dumped into the original contract bucket.
Finally, connect phase tracking to billing.
This is where the system starts paying off.
If time is entered by phase, invoices become easier to review. Project managers can see what work supports each billing amount. Fixed-fee billing can be reviewed against progress. Hourly work can flow more cleanly into invoices. Not-to-exceed phases can be monitored before they become write-offs.
That is the point.
The time entry process should feed the billing process.
The billing process should feed project visibility.
Project visibility should feed better management decisions.
When those pieces are connected, phase-based time tracking does not create admin work. It removes it.
Instead of rebuilding the story at billing time, the story is already in the system.
A Simple Rule for A/E Firms
Track time at the level where you manage the project and bill the client.
For most architecture and engineering firms, that means tracking by phase.
Not one giant project bucket.
Not a maze of tiny task codes.
Just a clear phase structure that matches the contract, supports billing, and shows where the work is really going.
That is how time tracking becomes useful without becoming another administrative chore.
Cut Your Billing Time by 60% Within 90 Days — Or We Refund Every Penny
We're so confident BaseBuilders will transform your billing process that we're putting our money where our mouth is.
BaseBuilders’ easy-to-use software is specifically designed to help small to mid-sized firms track time, manage projects, stay on top of expenses, and more. We’ll handle the invoicing for you so you can focus on growing your firm and designing wonderful spaces.