Chart of Accounts for Architecture and Engineering Firms
Why the Default Setup Fails and What to Use Instead
The chart of accounts is the foundation of everything your accounting system produces. Get it wrong and every financial metric downstream — net revenue, overhead factor, project profitability — is distorted from the start. Most A/E firms are running a chart of accounts designed for a different kind of business. Here's what the correct structure looks like and why each element matters.
Why the Chart of Accounts Matters More Than Most Firms Realize
The chart of accounts is not a bureaucratic formality. It is the organizational logic that determines what your accounting system can and cannot tell you.
A retail business needs a chart of accounts that tracks product costs, inventory, and sales by category. A law firm needs one that tracks billable hours and client disbursements by attorney. An A/E firm needs something different from both — a structure that makes net revenue visible, separates direct labor from overhead labor, and places consultant fees and direct project expenses in the right position to support meaningful profitability analysis.
Generic accounting software — QuickBooks, Xero, and others — ships with default chart of accounts templates designed for the most common small-business use cases. Architecture and engineering firms are not common small-business use cases. The defaults almost never produce the structure an A/E firm needs.
The consequences of a wrong chart of accounts are not immediately visible. The books balance. The reports run. The numbers look like numbers. The problem surfaces when a principal tries to calculate the overhead factor, measure project profitability against net revenue, or compare performance across projects with different consultant spend profiles — and discovers that the accounting system cannot produce those answers without manual reconstruction.
By then, the firm may have years of financial history organized around a structure that needs to be corrected. The earlier the chart of accounts is set up correctly, the less reconstruction is required later.
A wrong chart of accounts doesn't announce itself.
The books balance, the reports run, and the numbers look reasonable — until you try to calculate something that matters and discover the structure can't support it.
The Three Structural Decisions That Define an A/E Chart of Accounts
Every A/E firm's chart of accounts needs to get three structural decisions right. These decisions determine whether the accounting system can produce the financial metrics the firm needs to manage itself.
Decision 1: What goes in Cost of Goods Sold
COGS in an A/E firm should contain exactly two categories: consultant fees and direct project expenses.
Consultant fees are amounts paid to subconsultants — structural engineers, MEP engineers, civil engineers, surveyors, and any other outside professionals engaged on the project. These are recorded in COGS because they are costs incurred directly for a specific project. How those costs are billed to the client — at cost, with a markup, or included within the firm's fee — is a separate billing decision that has no bearing on how the cost is classified here.
Direct project expenses are costs incurred specifically for a project — permit fees, project-specific travel, printing, specialty testing, and similar items. These belong in COGS because they are direct project costs, not because they are billed to the client. Some will be recovered as reimbursables. Some will be absorbed. That billing decision is made separately and does not affect the classification.
Direct labor does not belong in COGS. This is the most consequential Chart of Accounts error in A/E accounting and the most common one. Labor — even labor charged directly to projects — is what the firm pays to deliver the work. It is a firm expense, not a direct project cost in the COGS sense. When it sits in COGS, gross profit no longer equals net revenue, and every metric calculated against gross profit is distorted as a result.
The test for whether any cost belongs in COGS is straightforward: was it incurred directly for a specific project? If yes, it belongs in COGS. If no — if it is a cost of running the firm that exists independent of any specific project — it belongs in expenses.
Decision 2: How payroll is organized in expenses
Once payroll is correctly in expenses rather than COGS, it needs to be split into two distinct accounts.
Payroll Direct captures compensation for hours charged to client projects. This is direct labor — the denominator in the overhead factor calculation and the basis for every billing rate the firm sets.
Payroll Overhead captures compensation for all other firm time — administration, marketing, management, internal meetings, business development, and training. This is indirect labor, part of the overhead burden that direct labor must recover through billing rates.
A single payroll account — the QuickBooks default — makes the overhead factor impossible to calculate. Two payroll accounts, correctly populated each pay period using time tracking data, make it straightforward.
Decision 3: Where all other overhead expenses sit
Every other cost of running the firm — rent, insurance, equipment leases, software subscriptions, professional development, marketing, bank fees, utilities, office supplies — belongs in the expenses section alongside payroll accounts. None of these belong in COGS because they are not incurred directly for a specific project. They are the costs of keeping the firm operational regardless of which projects are active.
The test for every cost is simple: was it incurred specifically for a client project and billed to that client?
If yes, it may belong in COGS. If no, it belongs in expenses. Most A/E firm overhead costs fail this test — including all labor.
The Complete A/E Firm Chart of Accounts
Here is the correct chart of accounts structure for an architecture or engineering firm, organized by section.
Income
Design Services is the primary revenue account. All fees for professional services are billed here. Some firms break this into subcategories by service type or discipline, which is useful for revenue analysis by practice area, but not required for the overhead factor calculation.
Other Income captures late payment fees, interest, and any other non-design-service revenue. Keeping this separate from design services makes the core professional services revenue figure clean and comparable across periods.
Cost of Goods Sold
A consultant account captures all amounts paid to subconsultants — the actual costs incurred for outside professional services engaged on specific projects. This account records spending, not billing. The amount here is what was paid to consultants, recorded at the time of payment. Billing treatment is handled separately.
Direct Expenses captures costs incurred specifically for individual projects — permit fees, project-specific travel, printing, specialty testing, and similar items. Again, this is spending, not billing. Whether any of these costs are recovered from the client as reimbursables is a billing decision made independently of how they are recorded here.
Expenses — Payroll
Payroll Direct is compensation for hours charged to client projects. The figure in this account, each pay period, comes from the time-tracking system—the dollar value of all hours logged to active project phases.
Payroll Overhead is compensation for all other firm time. The figure is total payroll minus Payroll Direct.
Payroll Taxes and Benefits covers employer payroll taxes, health insurance contributions, and retirement contributions. Carry these as a single overhead expense rather than allocating between direct and indirect payroll. The allocation adds complexity without meaningfully improving the overhead factor calculation, and consistency matters more than precision at this level.
Expenses — Overhead
The remaining accounts cover all other costs of running the firm. The specific accounts vary by firm size and operating structure, but the following are standard for most A/E practices:
Rent and occupancy covers office rent, common area maintenance, and parking.
Insurance covers professional liability, general liability, and workers compensation.
Equipment and technology covers computer equipment, software subscriptions, and other technology costs.
Marketing and business development covers website costs, proposal production, advertising, conference attendance, and client entertainment.
Professional development covers continuing education, licensing fees, and professional memberships.
Office operations covers supplies, postage, courier, and printing not billed to clients.
Banking and finance covers bank fees, credit card processing, and interest expense.
Utilities covers telephone, internet, electricity, and other utility costs.
Other Income and Expense
Bonuses tracks year-end or discretionary bonuses separately from regular payroll. Keeping bonuses here rather than in payroll accounts preserves the regularity of the Payroll Direct and Payroll Overhead figures, making period-to-period comparisons cleaner and the overhead factor more stable across the year.
The chart of accounts is not something to set up once and forget.
As the firm grows, adds service lines, or changes its cost structure, the account organization should evolve to keep the financial picture clear. The structure serves the firm — not the other way around.
Common Chart of Accounts Errors in A/E Firms — and How to Fix Them
Error 1: Direct labor in COGS
The most common and most consequential error. Moving direct labor from COGS to expenses requires creating the Payroll Direct account in expenses, reclassifying the affected transactions for the current period, and confirming that gross profit now equals net revenue in the corrected P&L. Prior years do not need to be restated. Correct the structure from a defined date going forward and use corrected periods for future analysis.
Error 2: Consultants are not consistently in COGS
Some firms book consultant fees to COGS on some projects and to expenses on others, depending on how individual invoices were coded. This inconsistency makes net revenue an unreliable benchmark because the amount of consultant spend above the gross profit line varies arbitrarily from period to period. The fix is a standing rule: all consultant fees are included in COGS, always, regardless of project type or billing method.
Error 3: Single payroll account
The QuickBooks default. Create Payroll Direct and Payroll Overhead as separate expense accounts and begin the per-pay-period journal entry process using direct labor figures from the project management system. The overhead factor becomes calculable immediately once two full pay periods are correctly recorded.
Error 4: Reimbursable income not tracked as its own income account
Some firms either book reimbursable billings to the same Design Services account as professional fees — inflating that figure — or net them against the direct expense in COGS, which understates net revenue. Neither is correct.
Reimbursable costs belong in Direct Expenses under COGS when incurred. The corresponding billing to the client — typically cost plus a small markup — belongs in a dedicated Reimbursable Income account in the Income section of the chart of accounts. This keeps Design Services clean as a pure professional fees figure, correctly reflects the small markup as earned income, and produces an accurate net revenue calculation. A firm that incurred $100 in reimbursable costs and billed $115 to the client has $115 in Reimbursable Income, $100 in Direct Expenses, and net revenue that correctly reflects both.
Error 5: Overhead costs coded inconsistently
Marketing costs are split between marketing accounts and office supplies. Software subscriptions are sometimes coded to technology and sometimes to office expenses. Insurance appears in multiple accounts. Inconsistent coding makes expense trend analysis unreliable and creates confusion when comparing periods. A one-page coding guide distributed to whoever processes transactions eliminates most inconsistency at no cost beyond the time to write it.
→ Read: Billing & Profitability for A/E Firms
→ Read: Proposals & Fees for A/E Firms
Cut Your Billing Time by 60% Within 90 Days — Or We Refund Every Penny
We're so confident BaseBuilders will transform your billing process that we're putting our money where our mouth is.